Claude Code Skills

Claude Code Skill

API Test Writer

Use when writing automated API tests or integration tests for REST or GraphQL endpoints, testing from an OpenAPI/Swagger spec or Postman collection, or checking status codes, response schemas, auth and error handling — Supertest, pytest + httpx, REST Assured, Postman/Newman and others.

Install

npx skills add WST2002/claude-code-skills --skill api-test-writer

Or copy skills/api-test-writer into ~/.claude/skills/.

Overview

API tests check the contract clients depend on: status codes, response shape, validation, authorization and side effects. They are faster and more stable than UI tests, so most functional coverage belongs here.

Method

  1. Inventory the endpoints from routes, controllers or the OpenAPI spec: method, path, auth, request schema, responses.
  2. Match the project's tooling: existing test framework and HTTP client (Supertest for Node, httpx/requests with pytest, REST Assured for Java, Newman for Postman collections). Follow existing test structure.
  3. Write cases per endpoint using the matrix below.
  4. Control data: create what each test needs through the API or factories, clean up afterwards, use unique values to allow parallel runs.
  5. Run the suite and confirm each new test fails when the behavior is broken (change an expected value once to check).

Case matrix per endpoint

Category Cases
Success Valid request → correct status (200/201/204), body matches schema, headers (Location, Content-Type)
Validation Missing required field, wrong type, out-of-range, too long, invalid format → 400/422 with field-level errors
Authentication No token, expired token, malformed token → 401
Authorization Other user's resource (IDOR), insufficient role → 403 or 404
Not found Unknown ID → 404 with the standard error shape
Conflicts Duplicate unique value, stale version → 409
Side effects Record created/updated in the database, event or email queued, idempotent retry does not duplicate
Lists Pagination, filters, sorting, empty results, max page size

Example (Node, Supertest + Vitest)

import request from "supertest";
import { describe, it, expect } from "vitest";
import { app } from "../src/app";
import { createUser, tokenFor } from "./factories";

describe("POST /orders", () => {
  it("creates an order and returns 201 with a Location header", async () => {
    const user = await createUser();
    const res = await request(app)
      .post("/orders")
      .set("Authorization", `Bearer ${tokenFor(user)}`)
      .send({ items: [{ sku: "SKU-1", quantity: 2 }] });

    expect(res.status).toBe(201);
    expect(res.headers.location).toMatch(/^\/orders\/\w+$/);
    expect(res.body).toMatchObject({ status: "pending", items: [{ sku: "SKU-1", quantity: 2 }] });
  });

  it("rejects quantity 0 with a field error", async () => {
    const user = await createUser();
    const res = await request(app)
      .post("/orders")
      .set("Authorization", `Bearer ${tokenFor(user)}`)
      .send({ items: [{ sku: "SKU-1", quantity: 0 }] });

    expect(res.status).toBe(422);
    expect(res.body.errors).toContainEqual(expect.objectContaining({ field: "items[0].quantity" }));
  });
});

Common mistakes

  • Only testing the happy path.
  • Asserting the whole response with a snapshot that includes IDs and timestamps.
  • Tests that depend on data created by another test.
  • Never testing authorization with a second user.
  • Hitting production or shared environments with destructive tests.

View source on GitHub